Hi,
在 2025/01/23 10:07, Yu Kuai 写道:
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 264756a54f59..9451cc5cc574 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -83,6 +83,9 @@ static const char *action_name[NR_SYNC_ACTIONS] = {
static LIST_HEAD(pers_list);
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pers_lock);
+static LIST_HEAD(bitmap_list);
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(bitmap_lock);
+
static const struct kobj_type md_ktype;
const struct md_cluster_operations *md_cluster_ops;
@@ -100,7 +103,6 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *md_wq;
* workqueue whith reconfig_mutex grabbed.
*/
static struct workqueue_struct *md_misc_wq;
-struct workqueue_struct *md_bitmap_wq;
static int remove_and_add_spares(struct mddev *mddev,
struct md_rdev *this);
@@ -650,15 +652,73 @@ static void active_io_release(struct percpu_ref *ref)
static void no_op(struct percpu_ref *r) {}
+void register_md_bitmap(struct bitmap_operations *op)
+{
+ pr_info("md: bitmap version %d registered\n", op->version);
+
+ spin_lock(&bitmap_lock);
+ list_add_tail(&op->list, &bitmap_list);
+ spin_unlock(&bitmap_lock);
+}
+
+void unregister_md_bitmap(struct bitmap_operations *op)
+{
+ pr_info("md: bitmap version %d unregistered\n", op->version);
+
+ spin_lock(&bitmap_lock);
+ list_del_init(&op->list);
+ spin_unlock(&bitmap_lock);
+}
+
+static struct bitmap_operations *find_bitmap(int version)
+{
+ struct bitmap_operations *op = NULL;
+ struct bitmap_operations *tmp;
+
+ spin_lock(&bitmap_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(tmp, &bitmap_list, list) {
+ if (tmp->version == version) {
+ op = tmp;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&bitmap_lock);
+
+ return op;
+}
Noted that, we already have pers_lock and pers_list for personalities,
md_cluster_ops and md_cluster_mod for md-cluster. Now, add bitmap_lock
and bitmap_list is a bit ugly.
I decided to refactor this a bit, by adding a new struct
md_submodule_head and unify all sub modules registeration,
unregisteration and lookup. Will send a set soon :)
Thanks,
Kuai