Re: [PATCH] dm vdo: use a short static string for thread name prefix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 22/01/2025 02:42, Matthew Sakai wrote:
Also remove MODULE_NAME, which is now unused.

This fixes a warning about string truncation in snprintf that
will never happen in practice:

drivers/md/dm-vdo/vdo.c: In function ‘vdo_make’:
drivers/md/dm-vdo/vdo.c:564:5: error: ‘%s’ directive output may be truncated writing up to 55 bytes into a region of size 16 [-Werror=format-truncation=]
     "%s%u", MODULE_NAME, instance);
      ^~
drivers/md/dm-vdo/vdo.c:563:2: note: ‘snprintf’ output between 2 and 66 bytes into a destination of size 16
   snprintf(vdo->thread_name_prefix, sizeof(vdo->thread_name_prefix),
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     "%s%u", MODULE_NAME, instance);
     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Suggested-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>

I am not sure that I did suggest this fix, but I did report this issue.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Sakai <msakai@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/md/dm-vdo/vdo.c | 8 +-------
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-vdo/vdo.c b/drivers/md/dm-vdo/vdo.c
index a7e32baab4af..40b3ff8c49cc 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-vdo/vdo.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-vdo/vdo.c
@@ -142,12 +142,6 @@ static void finish_vdo_request_queue(void *ptr)
  	vdo_unregister_allocating_thread();
  }
-#ifdef MODULE
-#define MODULE_NAME THIS_MODULE->name
-#else
-#define MODULE_NAME "dm-vdo"
-#endif  /* MODULE */
-
  static const struct vdo_work_queue_type default_queue_type = {
  	.start = start_vdo_request_queue,
  	.finish = finish_vdo_request_queue,
@@ -559,7 +553,7 @@ int vdo_make(unsigned int instance, struct device_config *config, char **reason,
  	*vdo_ptr = vdo;
snprintf(vdo->thread_name_prefix, sizeof(vdo->thread_name_prefix),
-		 "%s%u", MODULE_NAME, instance);
+		 "%s%u", "vdo", instance);

if you think that this is the right thing to do, then ok..

  	BUG_ON(vdo->thread_name_prefix[0] == '\0');

is there still some value in this check?

  	result = vdo_allocate(vdo->thread_config.thread_count,
  			      struct vdo_thread, __func__, &vdo->threads);





[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux