It took longer than I had hoped, but the patch I just sent should fix
the warning as well as simplifying the thread names.
On 1/9/25 10:20 AM, John Garry wrote:
On 08/01/2025 22:44, Matthew Sakai wrote:
BTW, as I understand, for CONFIG_DM_VDO=m, the module name is
"dm_vdo". So why different MODULE_NAME if MODULE is not defined ("dm-
vdo")?
That is a historical artifact and it should just get removed. The
module name should just be a constant string. I could write up a patch
to do this if you don't want to.
Yes, please do when you get a chance.
Thanks
It might take me a couple of days though because I'm still dealing
with some holiday backlog.
Even after we do this, I still think the prefix string should no
longer rely on the module name.
