On 12/2/24 11:36 AM, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 01:02:16PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >> The previous iteration[1] has been on the list for many weeks without >> receiving any comments - neither positive nor negative. If there are no >> objections - could we start discussing how to make these patches go >> upstream for v6.14? > > The way to do it will be for the block patches to be taken through the block > tree first. That will unblock the rest, which can be taken through their > respective trees in subsequent cycles. I can queue up patches 1..3 in a separate branch that we can both use, and that can get pulled into for-6.14/block as well. Didn't want to do that before the rest of them are ready. IOW, if it's going to be bound for 6.14, let me know, and I'll setup the branch with the patches. -- Jens Axboe
