Re: [PATCH] dm: add support for get_unique_id

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 30 Oct 2024, at 10:08, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 10:05:03AM -0400, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
>> Match each other in a multipath device you mean?  No, this will just return
>> the first one where get_unique_id returns non-zero.  Can they actually be
>> different, and if so should we return an error?
>
> That's what I've been wondering.  IIRC you can in theory create a
> kernel mpath table for any devices you want.  multipathd only creates
> them when the ids match, but do we want to rely on that?  It might be
> perfectly fine to say if you break you keep the pieces, but then
> I'd expected a comment about it in the comment.

Comment is easier than comparing them all, I'm happy to add it.  Seems like
a mpath table with different devices would make little pieces of anything
you try to put on it, and you wouldn't even get to keep those pieces.

Maybe other dm experts can think of ways that might break things.. I'll wait
a day or so.

Ben





[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux