On Mon, 23 Sep 2024, Ming-Hung Tsai wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 12:47 AM Dipendra Khadka <kdipendra88@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Smatch reported following:
> > '''
> > drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c:3204 parse_cblock_range() warn: sscanf doesn't return error codes
> > drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c:3217 parse_cblock_range() warn: sscanf doesn't return error codes
> > '''
> >
> > Since, the only negative value that is returned by sscanf is -1.
> > Returning -ENVAL when sscanf returns -1.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dipendra Khadka <kdipendra88@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c | 8 ++++----
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c b/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c
> > index 17f0fab1e254..c35d65e310d6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c
> > @@ -3200,8 +3200,8 @@ static int parse_cblock_range(struct cache *cache, const char *str,
> > * Try and parse form (ii) first.
> > */
> > r = sscanf(str, "%llu-%llu%c", &b, &e, &dummy);
> > - if (r < 0)
> > - return r;
> > + if (r == -1)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> >
> > if (r == 2) {
> > result->begin = to_cblock(b);
> > @@ -3213,8 +3213,8 @@ static int parse_cblock_range(struct cache *cache, const char *str,
> > * That didn't work, try form (i).
> > */
> > r = sscanf(str, "%llu%c", &b, &dummy);
> > - if (r < 0)
> > - return r;
> > + if (r == -1)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> >
> > if (r == 1) {
> > result->begin = to_cblock(b);
>
>
> Could you please clarify how to reproduce unexpected results? From
> what I observe, the kernel's sscanf doesn't return -1 on an empty
> input. Even if a negative value other than -EINVAL is returned, it is
> handled by the callers.
>
> Hank
I applied the patch, but I deleted the conditions "if (r == -1) return
-EINVAL;"
sscanf in the kernel doesn't return negative numbers.
Mikulas
