On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:53:49 +0000, John Garry wrote:
> This series introduces a proposal to implementing atomic writes in the
> kernel for torn-write protection.
>
> This series takes the approach of adding a new "atomic" flag to each of
> pwritev2() and iocb->ki_flags - RWF_ATOMIC and IOCB_ATOMIC, respectively.
> When set, these indicate that we want the write issued "atomically".
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[01/10] block: Pass blk_queue_get_max_sectors() a request pointer
commit: 8d1dfd51c84e202df05a999ce82cb27554f7d152
[02/10] block: Generalize chunk_sectors support as boundary support
commit: f70167a7a6e7e8a6911f3a216dc044cbfe7c1983
[03/10] fs: Initial atomic write support
commit: c34fc6f26ab86d03a2d47446f42b6cd492dfdc56
[04/10] fs: Add initial atomic write support info to statx
commit: 0f9ca80fa4f9670ba09721e4e36b8baf086a500c
[05/10] block: Add core atomic write support
commit: 9da3d1e912f3953196e66991d75208cde3e845e1
[06/10] block: Add atomic write support for statx
commit: 9abcfbd235f59fb5b6379e5bc0231dad831ebace
[07/10] block: Add fops atomic write support
commit: caf336f81b3a3ca744e335972e86ec7244512d4a
[08/10] scsi: sd: Atomic write support
commit: bf4ae8f2e6407a779c0368eb0f3e047a8333be17
[09/10] scsi: scsi_debug: Atomic write support
commit: 84f3a3c01d70efba736bc42155cf32722067b327
[10/10] nvme: Atomic write support
commit: 5f9bbea02f06110ec5cf95a3327019b3194b2d80
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
