On 5/30/24 07:40, Damien Le Moal wrote:
A zoned device with a smaller last zone together with a zone capacity
smaller than the zone size does make any sense as that does not
^not
correspond to any possible setup for a real device:
1) For ZNS and zoned UFS devices, all zones are always the same size.
2) For SMR HDDs, all zones always have the same capacity.
In other words, if we have a smaller last runt zone, then this zone
capacity should always be equal to the zone size.
Add a check in null_init_zoned_dev() to prevent a configuration to have
both a smaller zone size and a zone capacity smaller than the zone size.
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/block/null_blk/zoned.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/block/null_blk/zoned.c b/drivers/block/null_blk/zoned.c
index 79c8e5e99f7f..f118d304f310 100644
--- a/drivers/block/null_blk/zoned.c
+++ b/drivers/block/null_blk/zoned.c
@@ -74,6 +74,17 @@ int null_init_zoned_dev(struct nullb_device *dev,
return -EINVAL;
}
+ /*
+ * If a smaller zone capacity was requested, do not allow a smaller last
+ * zone at the same time as such zone configuration does not correspond
+ * to any real zoned device.
+ */
+ if (dev->zone_capacity != dev->zone_size &&
+ dev->size & (dev->zone_size - 1)) {
+ pr_err("A smaller last zone is not allowed with zone capacity smaller than zone size.\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
zone_capacity_sects = mb_to_sects(dev->zone_capacity);
dev_capacity_sects = mb_to_sects(dev->size);
dev->zone_size_sects = mb_to_sects(dev->zone_size);
Otherwise:
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
