Re: [PATCHv2] block: check for max_hw_sectors underflow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28/05/2024 11:58, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 11:54:42AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
I don't think that we ever check if lim->logical_block_size is a power-of-2
- but that's a given, right?
It has to be for the block stack to work.  That being said now that we
do have a single good place for sanity checks it's probably worth to
add this check explicitly.

I think that we might be able to get rid of some of the driver blk_validate_block_size() calls (if we do that), like __nbd_set_size() -> blk_validate_block_size()




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux