Re: [PATCH v4 17/28] null_blk: Introduce fua attribute

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Damien,

On 4/2/24 05:38, Damien Le Moal wrote:
+static bool g_fua = true;
+module_param_named(fua, g_fua, bool, S_IRUGO);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(zoned, "Enable/disable FUA support when cache_size is used. Default: true");
+

checkpatch is generating warning on this patch, please check :-

WARNING: Symbolic permissions 'S_IRUGO' are not preferred. Consider using octal permissions '0444'.
#31: FILE: drivers/block/null_blk/main.c:229:
+module_param_named(fua, g_fua, bool, S_IRUGO);

Also, I noticed that for zone_append_max_sectors attribute patch
you are using 0444 but for fua you are using S_IRUGO, any specific
reason ?

-ck






[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux