Re: [PATCH] dm vdo: use kernel byteswapping routines instead of GCC ones

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 05:44:05PM -0400, Matthew Sakai wrote:
>  static __always_inline u64 getblock64(const u64 *p, int i)
>  {
> -#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
> -	return p[i];
> -#elif __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
> -	return __builtin_bswap64(p[i]);
> -#else
> -#error "can't figure out byte order"
> -#endif
> +	return le64_to_cpup(&p[i]);
>  }
>  
>  static __always_inline void putblock64(u64 *p, int i, u64 value)
>  {
> -#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
> -	p[i] = value;
> -#elif __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
> -	p[i] = __builtin_bswap64(value);
> -#else
> -#error "can't figure out byte order"
> -#endif
> +	p[i] = cpu_to_le64(value);
>  }

This is very broken.  What you're actually looking for is get_unaligned_le64()
and put_unaligned_le64().  And they should be folded directly into the caller.

- Eric




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux