Re: [RFC PATCH v14 01/19] security: add ipe lsm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 3/11/2024 7:25 AM, Roberto Sassu wrote:
On Wed, 2024-03-06 at 15:34 -0800, Fan Wu wrote:
From: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Integrity Policy Enforcement (IPE) is an LSM that provides an
complimentary approach to Mandatory Access Control than existing LSMs
today.

Existing LSMs have centered around the concept of access to a resource
should be controlled by the current user's credentials. IPE's approach,
is that access to a resource should be controlled by the system's trust
of a current resource.

The basis of this approach is defining a global policy to specify which
resource can be trusted.

Signed-off-by: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Fan Wu <wufan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2:
   + Split evaluation loop, access control hooks,
     and evaluation loop from policy parser and userspace
     interface to pass mailing list character limit

v3:
   + Move ipe_load_properties to patch 04.
   + Remove useless 0-initializations
   + Prefix extern variables with ipe_
   + Remove kernel module parameters, as these are
     exposed through sysctls.
   + Add more prose to the IPE base config option
     help text.
   + Use GFP_KERNEL for audit_log_start.
   + Remove unnecessary caching system.
   + Remove comments from headers
   + Use rcu_access_pointer for rcu-pointer null check
   + Remove usage of reqprot; use prot only.
   + Move policy load and activation audit event to 03/12

v4:
   + Remove sysctls in favor of securityfs nodes
   + Re-add kernel module parameters, as these are now
     exposed through securityfs.
   + Refactor property audit loop to a separate function.

v5:
   + fix minor grammatical errors
   + do not group rule by curly-brace in audit record,
     reconstruct the exact rule.

v6:
   + No changes

v7:
   + Further split lsm creation into a separate commit from the
     evaluation loop and audit system, for easier review.

   + Introduce the concept of an ipe_context, a scoped way to
     introduce execution policies, used initially for allowing for
     kunit tests in isolation.

v8:
   + Follow lsmname_hook_name convention for lsm hooks.
   + Move LSM blob accessors to ipe.c and mark LSM blobs as static.

v9:
   + Remove ipe_context for simplification

v10:
   + Add github url

v11:
   + Correct github url
   + Move ipe before bpf

v12:
   + Switch to use lsm_id instead of string for lsm name

v13:
   + No changes

v14:
   + No changes
---
  MAINTAINERS              |  7 +++++++
  include/uapi/linux/lsm.h |  1 +
  security/Kconfig         | 11 ++++++-----
  security/Makefile        |  1 +
  security/ipe/Kconfig     | 17 +++++++++++++++++
  security/ipe/Makefile    |  9 +++++++++
  security/ipe/ipe.c       | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  security/ipe/ipe.h       | 16 ++++++++++++++++
  security/security.c      |  3 ++-
  9 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 security/ipe/Kconfig
  create mode 100644 security/ipe/Makefile
  create mode 100644 security/ipe/ipe.c
  create mode 100644 security/ipe/ipe.h

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 13158047f2af..8517011f88ff 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -10650,6 +10650,13 @@ T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/zohar/linux-integrity.git
  F:	security/integrity/
  F:	security/integrity/ima/
+INTEGRITY POLICY ENFORCEMENT (IPE)
+M:	Fan Wu <wufan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+L:	linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+S:	Supported
+T:	git https://github.com/microsoft/ipe.git
+F:	security/ipe/
+
  INTEL 810/815 FRAMEBUFFER DRIVER
  M:	Antonino Daplas <adaplas@xxxxxxxxx>
  L:	linux-fbdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/lsm.h b/include/uapi/linux/lsm.h
index f8aef9ade549..43e2fb32745a 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/lsm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/lsm.h
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct lsm_ctx {
  #define LSM_ID_LOCKDOWN		108
  #define LSM_ID_BPF		109
  #define LSM_ID_LANDLOCK		110
+#define LSM_ID_IPE		111
/*
   * LSM_ATTR_XXX definitions identify different LSM attributes
diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig
index 52c9af08ad35..cc7adfbb6b96 100644
--- a/security/Kconfig
+++ b/security/Kconfig
@@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ source "security/yama/Kconfig"
  source "security/safesetid/Kconfig"
  source "security/lockdown/Kconfig"
  source "security/landlock/Kconfig"
+source "security/ipe/Kconfig"
source "security/integrity/Kconfig" @@ -233,11 +234,11 @@ endchoice config LSM
  	string "Ordered list of enabled LSMs"
-	default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,smack,selinux,tomoyo,apparmor,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK
-	default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,apparmor,selinux,smack,tomoyo,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR
-	default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,tomoyo,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO
-	default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
-	default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,selinux,smack,tomoyo,apparmor,bpf"
+	default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,smack,selinux,tomoyo,apparmor,ipe,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK
+	default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,apparmor,selinux,smack,tomoyo,ipe,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR
+	default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,tomoyo,ipe,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO
+	default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,ipe,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
+	default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,selinux,smack,tomoyo,apparmor,ipe,bpf"
  	help
  	  A comma-separated list of LSMs, in initialization order.
  	  Any LSMs left off this list, except for those with order
diff --git a/security/Makefile b/security/Makefile
index 59f238490665..cc0982214b84 100644
--- a/security/Makefile
+++ b/security/Makefile
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_LOCKDOWN_LSM)	+= lockdown/
  obj-$(CONFIG_CGROUPS)			+= device_cgroup.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_LSM)			+= bpf/
  obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK)		+= landlock/
+obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_IPE)		+= ipe/
# Object integrity file lists
  obj-$(CONFIG_INTEGRITY)			+= integrity/
diff --git a/security/ipe/Kconfig b/security/ipe/Kconfig
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e4875fb04883
--- /dev/null
+++ b/security/ipe/Kconfig
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+#
+# Integrity Policy Enforcement (IPE) configuration
+#
+
+menuconfig SECURITY_IPE
+	bool "Integrity Policy Enforcement (IPE)"
+	depends on SECURITY && SECURITYFS
+	select PKCS7_MESSAGE_PARSER
+	select SYSTEM_DATA_VERIFICATION
+	help
+	  This option enables the Integrity Policy Enforcement LSM
+	  allowing users to define a policy to enforce a trust-based access
+	  control. A key feature of IPE is a customizable policy to allow
+	  admins to reconfigure trust requirements on the fly.
+
+	  If unsure, answer N.
diff --git a/security/ipe/Makefile b/security/ipe/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f7a80d0f18f8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/security/ipe/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#
+# Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
+#
+# Makefile for building the IPE module as part of the kernel tree.
+#
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_IPE) += \
+	ipe.o \
diff --git a/security/ipe/ipe.c b/security/ipe/ipe.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b013aed15e73
--- /dev/null
+++ b/security/ipe/ipe.c
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
+ */
+#include <uapi/linux/lsm.h>
+
+#include "ipe.h"
+
+static struct lsm_blob_sizes ipe_blobs __ro_after_init = {
+};
+
+static const struct lsm_id ipe_lsmid = {
+	.name = "ipe",
+	.id = LSM_ID_IPE,
+};
+
+static struct security_hook_list ipe_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
+};
+
+/**
+ * ipe_init - Entry point of IPE.
+ *
+ * This is called at LSM init, which happens occurs early during kernel
+ * start up. During this phase, IPE registers its hooks and loads the
+ * builtin boot policy.
+ * Return:
+ * * 0		- OK
+ * * -ENOMEM	- Out of memory
+ */
+static int __init ipe_init(void)
+{
+	security_add_hooks(ipe_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(ipe_hooks), &ipe_lsmid);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+DEFINE_LSM(ipe) = {
+	.name = "ipe",
+	.init = ipe_init,
+	.blobs = &ipe_blobs,
+};
diff --git a/security/ipe/ipe.h b/security/ipe/ipe.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a1c68d0fc2e0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/security/ipe/ipe.h
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
+ */
+
+#ifndef _IPE_H
+#define _IPE_H
+
+#ifdef pr_fmt
+#undef pr_fmt
+#endif
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) "IPE: " fmt
+
+#include <linux/lsm_hooks.h>
+
+#endif /* _IPE_H */
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 7035ee35a393..f168bc30a60d 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -51,7 +51,8 @@
  	(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SECURITY_SAFESETID) ? 1 : 0) + \
  	(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SECURITY_LOCKDOWN_LSM) ? 1 : 0) + \
  	(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_LSM) ? 1 : 0) + \
-	(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK) ? 1 : 0))
+	(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK) ? 1 : 0) + \
+	(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SECURITY_IPE) ? 1 : 0))

Hi Fan

you would also need to update
tools/testing/selftests/lsm/lsm_list_modules_test.c.

Roberto
  /*
   * These are descriptions of the reasons that can be passed to the

Hi Roberto,

Thanks for the info. I will also update that file.

-Fan




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux