[PATCH md-6.8 v2 1/9] md: don't clear MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN for new dm-raid until resume

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>

After commit 9dbd1aa3a81c ("dm raid: add reshaping support to the
target") raid_ctr() will set MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN before md_run() and
expect to keep array frozen until resume. However, md_run() will clear
the flag by setting mddev->recovery to 0.

Before commit 1baae052cccd ("md: Don't ignore suspended array in
md_check_recovery()"), dm-raid actually relied on suspending to prevent
starting new sync_thread.

Fix this problem by keeping 'MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN' for dm-raid in
md_run().

Fixes: 1baae052cccd ("md: Don't ignore suspended array in md_check_recovery()")
Fixes: 9dbd1aa3a81c ("dm raid: add reshaping support to the target")
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/md/md.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 9e41a9aaba8b..23f31fd1d024 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -6038,7 +6038,10 @@ int md_run(struct mddev *mddev)
 			pr_warn("True protection against single-disk failure might be compromised.\n");
 	}
 
-	mddev->recovery = 0;
+	/* dm-raid expect sync_thread to be frozen until resume */
+	if (mddev->gendisk)
+		mddev->recovery = 0;
+
 	/* may be over-ridden by personality */
 	mddev->resync_max_sectors = mddev->dev_sectors;
 
-- 
2.39.2





[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux