Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] 11-dm-lvm.rules: don't restore DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG from db

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/1/24 23:40, Martin Wilck wrote:
> DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG is used as the "output" flag of the
> device-mapper rules, to be consumed by non-dm rules. It is a logical OR of
> several conditions that might make dm devices inaccessible. 10-dm.rules
> calculates it for every uevent, whether it's genuine or spurious.
> 
> DM_SUBSYSTEM_UDEV_FLAG0 is just another flag that needs to be or'd in. We
> don't need to restore the previous state of DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG.
> Actually, doing so is wrong if the flag has previously been set because the
> device was suspended, and the device isn't suspended anymore.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  udev/11-dm-lvm.rules.in | 13 +++++--------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/udev/11-dm-lvm.rules.in b/udev/11-dm-lvm.rules.in
> index 7c58994..0b77fe2 100644
> --- a/udev/11-dm-lvm.rules.in
> +++ b/udev/11-dm-lvm.rules.in
> @@ -26,14 +26,11 @@ IMPORT{program}="(DM_EXEC)/dmsetup splitname --nameprefixes --noheadings --rows
>  # to zero any stale metadata found within the LV data area. Such stale
>  # metadata could cause false claim of the LV device, keeping it open etc.
>  #
> -# If the NOSCAN flag is present, backup selected existing flags used to
> -# disable rules, then set them firmly so those selected rules are surely skipped.
> -# Restore these flags once the NOSCAN flag is dropped (which is normally any
> -# uevent that follows for this LV, even an artificially generated one).
> -ENV{DM_SUBSYSTEM_UDEV_FLAG0}=="1", ENV{DM_NOSCAN}="1", ENV{DM_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG_OLD}="$env{DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG}", ENV{DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG}="1"
> -ENV{DM_SUBSYSTEM_UDEV_FLAG0}!="1", IMPORT{db}="DM_NOSCAN", IMPORT{db}="DM_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG_OLD"
> -ENV{DM_SUBSYSTEM_UDEV_FLAG0}!="1", ENV{DM_NOSCAN}=="1", ENV{DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG}="$env{DM_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG_OLD}", \
> -				   ENV{DM_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG_OLD}="", ENV{DM_NOSCAN}=""
> +# If the NOSCAN flag is present, set DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG
> +# so those selected rules are surely skipped.
> +# We don't need to save and restore the previous of DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG,
> +# that's taken care of in 10-dm.rules.
> +ENV{DM_SUBSYSTEM_UDEV_FLAG0}=="1", ENV{DM_NOSCAN}="1", ENV{DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG}="1"
>  
>  ENV{DM_UDEV_DISABLE_SUBSYSTEM_RULES_FLAG}=="1", GOTO="lvm_end"
>  

Looks good too, I gave it a quick test run and haven't noticed an issue
so far. Nice cleanup!

-- 
Peter





[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux