Re: [PATCH v5 04/14] md: don't register sync_thread for reshape directly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

在 2024/02/28 20:07, Xiao Ni 写道:
I have a question here. Is it the reason sync_thread can't run md_do_sync because kthread_should_stop, so it doesn't have the chance to set MD_RECOVERY_DONE? Why creating sync thread in md_check_recovery doesn't have this problem? Could you explain more about this?

raid10_run() only register sync_thread, without calling
md_wakeup_thread() to set the bit 'THREAD_WAKEUP', md_do_sync() will not
be executed.

raid5 defines 'pers->start' hence md_start() will call
md_wakeup_thread().

md_start_sync() will always call md_wakeup_thread() hence there is no
such problem.

BTW, this patch fix the same problem as you mentioned in your other
thread:

diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 2266358d8074..54790261254d 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -4904,6 +4904,7 @@ static void stop_sync_thread(struct mddev *mddev, bool locked, bool check_seq)
 	 * never happen
 	 */
 	md_wakeup_thread_directly(mddev->sync_thread);
+	md_wakeup_thread(mddev->sync_thread);
 	if (work_pending(&mddev->sync_work))
 		flush_work(&mddev->sync_work);

However, I think the one to register sync_thread is responsible to wake
it up.

Thanks,
Kuai





[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux