Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] dm-raid/md: Clear MD_RECOVERY_WAIT when stopping dmraid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 11:32 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> 在 2024/02/20 23:30, Xiao Ni 写道:
> > MD_RECOVERY_WAIT is used by dmraid to delay reshape process by patch
> > commit 644e2537fdc7 ("dm raid: fix stripe adding reshape deadlock").
> > Before patch commit f52f5c71f3d4b ("md: fix stopping sync thread")
> > dmraid stopped sync thread directy by calling md_reap_sync_thread.
> > After this patch dmraid stops sync thread asynchronously as md does.
> > This is right. Now the dmraid stop process is like this:
> >
> > 1. raid_postsuspend->md_stop_writes->__md_stop_writes->stop_sync_thread.
> > stop_sync_thread sets MD_RECOVERY_INTR and wait until MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING
> > is cleared
> > 2. md_do_sync finds MD_RECOVERY_WAIT is set and return. (This is the
> > root cause for this deadlock. We hope md_do_sync can set MD_RECOVERY_DONE)
> > 3. md thread calls md_check_recovery (This is the place to reap sync
> > thread. Because MD_RECOVERY_DONE is not set. md thread can't reap sync
> > thread)
> > 4. raid_dtr stops/free struct mddev and release dmraid related resources
> >
> > dmraid only sets MD_RECOVERY_WAIT but doesn't clear it. It needs to clear
> > this bit when stopping the dmraid before stopping sync thread.
> >
> > But the deadlock still can happen sometimes even MD_RECOVERY_WAIT is
> > cleared before stopping sync thread. It's the reason stop_sync_thread only
> > wakes up task. If the task isn't running, it still needs to wake up sync
> > thread too.
> >
> > This deadlock can be reproduced 100% by these commands:
> > modprobe brd rd_size=34816 rd_nr=5
> > while [ 1 ]; do
> > vgcreate test_vg /dev/ram*
> > lvcreate --type raid5 -L 16M -n test_lv test_vg
> > lvconvert -y --stripes 4 /dev/test_vg/test_lv
> > vgremove test_vg -ff
> > sleep 1
> > done
> >
> > Fixes: 644e2537fdc7 ("dm raid: fix stripe adding reshape deadlock")
> > Fixes: f52f5c71f3d4 ("md: fix stopping sync thread")
> > Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I'm not sure about this change, I think MD_RECOVERY_WAIT is hacky and
> really breaks how sync_thread is working, it should just go away soon,
> once we make sure sync_thread can't be registered before pers->start()
> is done.

Hi Kuai

I just want to get to a stable state without changing any existing
logic. After fixing these regressions, we can consider other changes.
(e.g. remove MD_RECOVERY_WAIT. allow sync thread start/stop when array
is suspend. )  I talked with Heinz yesterday, for dm-raid, it can't
allow any io to happen including sync thread when array is suspended.

Regards
Xiao
>
> Thanks,
> Kuai
> > ---
> >   drivers/md/dm-raid.c | 2 ++
> >   drivers/md/md.c      | 1 +
> >   2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
> > index eb009d6bb03a..325767c1140f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
> > @@ -3796,6 +3796,8 @@ static void raid_postsuspend(struct dm_target *ti)
> >       struct raid_set *rs = ti->private;
> >
> >       if (!test_and_set_bit(RT_FLAG_RS_SUSPENDED, &rs->runtime_flags)) {
> > +             if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_WAIT, &rs->md.recovery))
> > +                     clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_WAIT, &rs->md.recovery);
> >               /* Writes have to be stopped before suspending to avoid deadlocks. */
> >               if (!test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, &rs->md.recovery))
> >                       md_stop_writes(&rs->md);
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> > index 2266358d8074..54790261254d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> > @@ -4904,6 +4904,7 @@ static void stop_sync_thread(struct mddev *mddev, bool locked, bool check_seq)
> >        * never happen
> >        */
> >       md_wakeup_thread_directly(mddev->sync_thread);
> > +     md_wakeup_thread(mddev->sync_thread);
> >       if (work_pending(&mddev->sync_work))
> >               flush_work(&mddev->sync_work);
> >
> >
>






[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux