[PATCH] dm vdo: fix an assert statement in start_restoring_volume_sub_index()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Use "==" instead of "=" in ASSERT() statement.

Fixes: ef074a31e88e ("dm vdo: implement the volume index")
Signed-off-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
This is based on static analysis with Smatch and only compile tested.
---
 drivers/md/dm-vdo/indexer/volume-index.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-vdo/indexer/volume-index.c b/drivers/md/dm-vdo/indexer/volume-index.c
index 5fe34e6c1d9b..d6526fe9bbfc 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-vdo/indexer/volume-index.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-vdo/indexer/volume-index.c
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ static int start_restoring_volume_sub_index(struct volume_sub_index *sub_index,
 		decode_u32_le(buffer, &offset, &header.first_list);
 		decode_u32_le(buffer, &offset, &header.list_count);
 
-		result = ASSERT(offset = sizeof(buffer),
+		result = ASSERT(offset == sizeof(buffer),
 				"%zu bytes decoded of %zu expected", offset,
 				sizeof(buffer));
 		if (result != UDS_SUCCESS)
-- 
2.39.3





[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux