On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 21:17 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: > Is z0-dm-mpath-last.rules the right way to name this? I'm a little > worried that something will expect a two-digit beginning to udev > rules > files, and a name like 99-z0-dm-mpath-last.rules would be more > appropriate (if even longer). Yeah, that's better perhaps. I had chosen 99-dm-mpath-late.rules first, but then I realized that there was 99-systemd.rules. '99-z-dm-mpath-late.rules' might look even nicer (and takes advantage of the fact that "-" is lexically sorted before all digits and letters). Thanks, Martin
