Re: [PATCH v4 02/12] nvdimm/pmem: Treat alloc_dax() -EOPNOTSUPP failure as non-fatal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024-02-08 16:32, Dan Williams wrote:
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
In preparation for checking whether the architecture has data cache
aliasing within alloc_dax(), modify the error handling of nvdimm/pmem
pmem_attach_disk() to treat alloc_dax() -EOPNOTSUPP failure as non-fatal.

For the transition, consider that alloc_dax() returning NULL is the
same as returning -EOPNOTSUPP.

Fixes: d92576f1167c ("dax: does not work correctly with virtual aliasing caches")
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alasdair Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-cxl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: nvdimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
  drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
index 9fe358090720..f1d9f5c6dbac 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
@@ -558,19 +558,21 @@ static int pmem_attach_disk(struct device *dev,
  	disk->bb = &pmem->bb;
dax_dev = alloc_dax(pmem, &pmem_dax_ops);
-	if (IS_ERR(dax_dev)) {
-		rc = PTR_ERR(dax_dev);
-		goto out;
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dax_dev)) {

alloc_dax() should never return NULL. I.e. the lead in before this patch
should fix this misunderstanding:

diff --git a/include/linux/dax.h b/include/linux/dax.h
index b463502b16e1..df2d52b8a245 100644
--- a/include/linux/dax.h
+++ b/include/linux/dax.h
@@ -86,11 +86,7 @@ static inline void *dax_holder(struct dax_device *dax_dev)
  static inline struct dax_device *alloc_dax(void *private,
                 const struct dax_operations *ops)
  {
-       /*
-        * Callers should check IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DAX) to know if this
-        * NULL is an error or expected.
-        */
-       return NULL;
+       return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
  }
  static inline void put_dax(struct dax_device *dax_dev)
  {

+		rc = IS_ERR(dax_dev) ? PTR_ERR(dax_dev) : -EOPNOTSUPP;

Then this ternary can be replaced with just a check of which PTR_ERR()
value is being returned.

As you noted, I've introduced this as cleanups in later patches. I don't
mind folding these into their respective per-driver commits and moving
the alloc_dax() hunk earlier in the series.

Thanks,

Mathieu


--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com





[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux