Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] dm-raid: fix v6.7 regressions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

在 2024/01/31 10:52, Yu Kuai 写道:
Hi,

在 2024/01/31 9:28, Xiao Ni 写道:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 9:25 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi, Xiao Ni!

在 2024/01/31 8:29, Xiao Ni 写道:
In my environment, the lvm2 regression test has passed. There are only
three failed cases which also fail in kernel 6.6.

###       failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/lvresize-fs-crypt.sh
###       failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/pvck-dump.sh
###       failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/select-report.sh
### 426 tests: 346 passed, 70 skipped, 0 timed out, 7 warned, 3 failed
    in 89:26.073

Thanks for the test, this is greate news.

Kuai


Hi Kuai

Have you run mdadm regression tests based on this patch set?

BTW, I just make sure there are no new failed tests, however, there
looks like some tests are broken. For example:

04update-metadata:

++ /root/mdadm/mdadm --quiet -CR --assume-clean -e 0.90 /dev/md0 --level linear -n 4 -c 64 /dev/loop0 /dev/loop1 /dev/loop2 /dev/loop3 --auto=yes
++ rv=1
++ case $* in
++ cat /var/tmp/stderr
mdadm: RUN_ARRAY failed: Invalid argument

04r1update:

++ /root/mdadm/mdadm --quiet -A /dev/md0 -U resync /dev/loop0 /dev/loop1
++ rv=1
++ case $* in
++ cat /var/tmp/stderr
mdadm: --update=resync not understood for 1.x metadata

Thanks,
Kuai


Of course, I'm runing in my VM with loop devices.

Thanks,
Kuai


Regards
Xiao

.


.






[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux