Re: [PATCH -next v2 03/28] md: add new helpers to suspend/resume array

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 3:21 PM Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 10:04 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Advantages for new apis:
> >  - reconfig_mutex is not required;
> >  - the weird logical that suspend array hold 'reconfig_mutex' for
> >    mddev_check_recovery() to update superblock is not needed;
> >  - the specail handling, 'pers->prepare_suspend', for raid456 is not
> >    needed;
> >  - It's safe to be called at any time once mddev is allocated, and it's
> >    designed to be used from slow path where array configuration is changed;
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/md/md.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  drivers/md/md.h |  3 ++
> >  2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> > index 7fa311a14317..6236e2e395c1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> > @@ -443,12 +443,22 @@ void mddev_suspend(struct mddev *mddev)
> >                         lockdep_is_held(&mddev->reconfig_mutex));
> >
> >         WARN_ON_ONCE(thread && current == thread->tsk);
> > -       if (mddev->suspended++)
> > +
> > +       /* can't concurrent with __mddev_suspend() and __mddev_resume() */
> > +       mutex_lock(&mddev->suspend_mutex);
> > +       if (mddev->suspended++) {
> > +               mutex_unlock(&mddev->suspend_mutex);
> >                 return;
> > +       }
> > +
> >         wake_up(&mddev->sb_wait);
> >         set_bit(MD_ALLOW_SB_UPDATE, &mddev->flags);
> >         percpu_ref_kill(&mddev->active_io);
> >
> > +       /*
> > +        * TODO: cleanup 'pers->prepare_suspend after all callers are replaced
> > +        * by __mddev_suspend().
> > +        */
> >         if (mddev->pers && mddev->pers->prepare_suspend)
> >                 mddev->pers->prepare_suspend(mddev);
> >
> > @@ -459,14 +469,21 @@ void mddev_suspend(struct mddev *mddev)
> >         del_timer_sync(&mddev->safemode_timer);
> >         /* restrict memory reclaim I/O during raid array is suspend */
> >         mddev->noio_flag = memalloc_noio_save();
> > +
> > +       mutex_unlock(&mddev->suspend_mutex);
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mddev_suspend);
> >
> >  void mddev_resume(struct mddev *mddev)
> >  {
> >         lockdep_assert_held(&mddev->reconfig_mutex);
> > -       if (--mddev->suspended)
> > +
> > +       /* can't concurrent with __mddev_suspend() and __mddev_resume() */
> > +       mutex_lock(&mddev->suspend_mutex);
> > +       if (--mddev->suspended) {
> > +               mutex_unlock(&mddev->suspend_mutex);
> >                 return;
> > +       }
> >
> >         /* entred the memalloc scope from mddev_suspend() */
> >         memalloc_noio_restore(mddev->noio_flag);
> > @@ -477,9 +494,72 @@ void mddev_resume(struct mddev *mddev)
> >         set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery);
> >         md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
> >         md_wakeup_thread(mddev->sync_thread); /* possibly kick off a reshape */
> > +
> > +       mutex_unlock(&mddev->suspend_mutex);
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mddev_resume);
> >
> > +void __mddev_suspend(struct mddev *mddev)
> > +{
> > +
> > +       /*
> > +        * hold reconfig_mutex to wait for normal io will deadlock, because
> > +        * other context can't update super_block, and normal io can rely on
> > +        * updating super_block.
> > +        */
> > +       lockdep_assert_not_held(&mddev->reconfig_mutex);
> > +
> > +       mutex_lock(&mddev->suspend_mutex);
> > +
> > +       if (mddev->suspended) {
> > +               WRITE_ONCE(mddev->suspended, mddev->suspended + 1);
> > +               mutex_unlock(&mddev->suspend_mutex);
> > +               return;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       percpu_ref_kill(&mddev->active_io);
> > +       wait_event(mddev->sb_wait, percpu_ref_is_zero(&mddev->active_io));
> > +
> > +       /*
> > +        * For raid456, io might be waiting for reshape to make progress,
> > +        * allow new reshape to start while waiting for io to be done to
> > +        * prevent deadlock.
> > +        */
> > +       WRITE_ONCE(mddev->suspended, mddev->suspended + 1);
>
> It changes the order of setting suspended and checking active_io.
> suspended is used to stop I/O. Now it checks active_io first and then
> adds suspended, if the i/o doesn't stop, it looks like active_io can't
> be 0. So it will stuck at waiting active_io to be 0?

Ah, I c, you add the state of active_io to judge if a raid is suspended.

Regards
Xiao
>
> Best Regards
> Xiao
>
> > +
> > +       del_timer_sync(&mddev->safemode_timer);
> > +       /* restrict memory reclaim I/O during raid array is suspend */
> > +       mddev->noio_flag = memalloc_noio_save();
> > +
> > +       mutex_unlock(&mddev->suspend_mutex);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__mddev_suspend);
> > +
> > +void __mddev_resume(struct mddev *mddev)
> > +{
> > +       lockdep_assert_not_held(&mddev->reconfig_mutex);
> > +
> > +       mutex_lock(&mddev->suspend_mutex);
> > +       WRITE_ONCE(mddev->suspended, mddev->suspended - 1);
> > +       if (mddev->suspended) {
> > +               mutex_unlock(&mddev->suspend_mutex);
> > +               return;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       /* entred the memalloc scope from __mddev_suspend() */
> > +       memalloc_noio_restore(mddev->noio_flag);
> > +
> > +       percpu_ref_resurrect(&mddev->active_io);
> > +       wake_up(&mddev->sb_wait);
> > +
> > +       set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery);
> > +       md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
> > +       md_wakeup_thread(mddev->sync_thread); /* possibly kick off a reshape */
> > +
> > +       mutex_unlock(&mddev->suspend_mutex);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__mddev_resume);
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Generic flush handling for md
> >   */
> > @@ -667,6 +747,7 @@ int mddev_init(struct mddev *mddev)
> >         mutex_init(&mddev->open_mutex);
> >         mutex_init(&mddev->reconfig_mutex);
> >         mutex_init(&mddev->sync_mutex);
> > +       mutex_init(&mddev->suspend_mutex);
> >         mutex_init(&mddev->bitmap_info.mutex);
> >         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mddev->disks);
> >         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mddev->all_mddevs);
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/md.h b/drivers/md/md.h
> > index fb3b123f16dd..1103e6b08ad9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/md.h
> > +++ b/drivers/md/md.h
> > @@ -316,6 +316,7 @@ struct mddev {
> >         unsigned long                   sb_flags;
> >
> >         int                             suspended;
> > +       struct mutex                    suspend_mutex;
> >         struct percpu_ref               active_io;
> >         int                             ro;
> >         int                             sysfs_active; /* set when sysfs deletes
> > @@ -811,6 +812,8 @@ extern void md_rdev_clear(struct md_rdev *rdev);
> >  extern void md_handle_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio);
> >  extern void mddev_suspend(struct mddev *mddev);
> >  extern void mddev_resume(struct mddev *mddev);
> > +extern void __mddev_suspend(struct mddev *mddev);
> > +extern void __mddev_resume(struct mddev *mddev);
> >
> >  extern void md_reload_sb(struct mddev *mddev, int raid_disk);
> >  extern void md_update_sb(struct mddev *mddev, int force);
> > --
> > 2.39.2
> >

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux