The shrinker_rwsem is a global read-write lock in shrinkers subsystem,
which protects most operations such as slab shrink, registration and
unregistration of shrinkers, etc. This can easily cause problems in the
following cases.
1) When the memory pressure is high and there are many filesystems
mounted or unmounted at the same time, slab shrink will be affected
(down_read_trylock() failed).
Such as the real workload mentioned by Kirill Tkhai:
```
One of the real workloads from my experience is start
of an overcommitted node containing many starting
containers after node crash (or many resuming containers
after reboot for kernel update). In these cases memory
pressure is huge, and the node goes round in long reclaim.
```
2) If a shrinker is blocked (such as the case mentioned
in [1]) and a writer comes in (such as mount a fs),
then this writer will be blocked and cause all
subsequent shrinker-related operations to be blocked.
Even if there is no competitor when shrinking slab, there may still be a
problem. The down_read_trylock() may become a perf hotspot with frequent
calls to shrink_slab(). Because of the poor multicore scalability of
atomic operations, this can lead to a significant drop in IPC
(instructions per cycle).
We used to implement the lockless slab shrink with SRCU [2], but then
kernel test robot reported -88.8% regression in
stress-ng.ramfs.ops_per_sec test case [3], so we reverted it [4].
This commit uses the refcount+RCU method [5] proposed by Dave Chinner
to re-implement the lockless global slab shrink. The memcg slab shrink is
handled in the subsequent patch.
For now, all shrinker instances are converted to dynamically allocated and
will be freed by call_rcu(). So we can use rcu_read_{lock,unlock}() to
ensure that the shrinker instance is valid.
And the shrinker instance will not be run again after unregistration. So
the structure that records the pointer of shrinker instance can be safely
freed without waiting for the RCU read-side critical section.
In this way, while we implement the lockless slab shrink, we don't need to
be blocked in unregister_shrinker().
The following are the test results:
stress-ng --timeout 60 --times --verify --metrics-brief --ramfs 9 &
1) Before applying this patchset:
setting to a 60 second run per stressor
dispatching hogs: 9 ramfs
stressor bogo ops real time usr time sys time bogo ops/s bogo ops/s
(secs) (secs) (secs) (real time) (usr+sys time)
ramfs 735238 60.00 12.37 363.70 12253.05 1955.08
for a 60.01s run time:
1440.27s available CPU time
12.36s user time ( 0.86%)
363.70s system time ( 25.25%)
376.06s total time ( 26.11%)
load average: 10.79 4.47 1.69
passed: 9: ramfs (9)
failed: 0
skipped: 0
successful run completed in 60.01s (1 min, 0.01 secs)
2) After applying this patchset:
setting to a 60 second run per stressor
dispatching hogs: 9 ramfs
stressor bogo ops real time usr time sys time bogo ops/s bogo ops/s
(secs) (secs) (secs) (real time) (usr+sys time)
ramfs 746698 60.00 12.45 376.16 12444.02 1921.47
for a 60.01s run time:
1440.28s available CPU time
12.44s user time ( 0.86%)
376.16s system time ( 26.12%)
388.60s total time ( 26.98%)
load average: 9.01 3.85 1.49
passed: 9: ramfs (9)
failed: 0
skipped: 0
successful run completed in 60.01s (1 min, 0.01 secs)
We can see that the ops/s has hardly changed.
[1]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191129214541.3110-1-ptikhomirov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
[2]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230313112819.38938-1-zhengqi.arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
[3]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202305230837.db2c233f-yujie.liu@xxxxxxxxx/
[4]. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230609081518.3039120-1-qi.zheng@xxxxxxxxx/
[5]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZIJhou1d55d4H1s0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/shrinker.h | 17 ++++++++++
mm/shrinker.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/shrinker.h b/include/linux/shrinker.h
index eb342994675a..f06225f18531 100644
--- a/include/linux/shrinker.h
+++ b/include/linux/shrinker.h
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
#include <linux/atomic.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/refcount.h>
+#include <linux/completion.h>
#define SHRINKER_UNIT_BITS BITS_PER_LONG
@@ -87,6 +89,10 @@ struct shrinker {
int seeks; /* seeks to recreate an obj */
unsigned flags;
+ refcount_t refcount;
+ struct completion done;
+ struct rcu_head rcu;
+
void *private_data;
/* These are for internal use */
@@ -120,6 +126,17 @@ struct shrinker *shrinker_alloc(unsigned int flags, const char *fmt, ...);
void shrinker_register(struct shrinker *shrinker);
void shrinker_free(struct shrinker *shrinker);
+static inline bool shrinker_try_get(struct shrinker *shrinker)
+{
+ return refcount_inc_not_zero(&shrinker->refcount);
+}
+
+static inline void shrinker_put(struct shrinker *shrinker)
+{
+ if (refcount_dec_and_test(&shrinker->refcount))
+ complete(&shrinker->done);
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SHRINKER_DEBUG
extern int __printf(2, 3) shrinker_debugfs_rename(struct shrinker *shrinker,
const char *fmt, ...);
diff --git a/mm/shrinker.c b/mm/shrinker.c
index 1911c06b8af5..d318f5621862 100644
--- a/mm/shrinker.c
+++ b/mm/shrinker.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
#include <linux/memcontrol.h>
#include <linux/rwsem.h>
#include <linux/shrinker.h>
+#include <linux/rculist.h>
#include <trace/events/vmscan.h>
#include "internal.h"
@@ -577,33 +578,42 @@ unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
if (!mem_cgroup_disabled() && !mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
return shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_mask, nid, memcg, priority);
- if (!down_read_trylock(&shrinker_rwsem))
- goto out;
-
- list_for_each_entry(shrinker, &shrinker_list, list) {
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(shrinker, &shrinker_list, list) {
struct shrink_control sc = {
.gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
.nid = nid,
.memcg = memcg,
};
+ if (!shrinker_try_get(shrinker))
+ continue;
+
+ /*
+ * We can safely unlock the RCU lock here since we already
+ * hold the refcount of the shrinker.
+ */
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
ret = do_shrink_slab(&sc, shrinker, priority);
if (ret == SHRINK_EMPTY)
ret = 0;
freed += ret;
+
/*
- * Bail out if someone want to register a new shrinker to
- * prevent the registration from being stalled for long periods
- * by parallel ongoing shrinking.
+ * This shrinker may be deleted from shrinker_list and freed
+ * after the shrinker_put() below, but this shrinker is still
+ * used for the next traversal. So it is necessary to hold the
+ * RCU lock first to prevent this shrinker from being freed,
+ * which also ensures that the next shrinker that is traversed
+ * will not be freed (even if it is deleted from shrinker_list
+ * at the same time).
*/
- if (rwsem_is_contended(&shrinker_rwsem)) {
- freed = freed ? : 1;
- break;
- }
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ shrinker_put(shrinker);
}
- up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
-out:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
cond_resched();
return freed;
}
@@ -671,13 +681,29 @@ void shrinker_register(struct shrinker *shrinker)
}
down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
- list_add_tail(&shrinker->list, &shrinker_list);
+ list_add_tail_rcu(&shrinker->list, &shrinker_list);
shrinker->flags |= SHRINKER_REGISTERED;
shrinker_debugfs_add(shrinker);
up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+
+ init_completion(&shrinker->done);
+ /*
+ * Now the shrinker is fully set up, take the first reference to it to
+ * indicate that lookup operations are now allowed to use it via
+ * shrinker_try_get().
+ */
+ refcount_set(&shrinker->refcount, 1);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(shrinker_register);
+static void shrinker_free_rcu_cb(struct rcu_head *head)
+{
+ struct shrinker *shrinker = container_of(head, struct shrinker, rcu);
+
+ kfree(shrinker->nr_deferred);
+ kfree(shrinker);
+}
+
void shrinker_free(struct shrinker *shrinker)
{
struct dentry *debugfs_entry = NULL;
@@ -686,9 +712,18 @@ void shrinker_free(struct shrinker *shrinker)
if (!shrinker)
return;
+ if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_REGISTERED) {
+ shrinker_put(shrinker);
+ wait_for_completion(&shrinker->done);
+ }
+
down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_REGISTERED) {
- list_del(&shrinker->list);
+ /*
+ * Lookups on the shrinker are over and will fail in the future,
+ * so we can now remove it from the lists and free it.
+ */
+ list_del_rcu(&shrinker->list);
debugfs_entry = shrinker_debugfs_detach(shrinker, &debugfs_id);
shrinker->flags &= ~SHRINKER_REGISTERED;
} else {
@@ -702,9 +737,6 @@ void shrinker_free(struct shrinker *shrinker)
if (debugfs_entry)
shrinker_debugfs_remove(debugfs_entry, debugfs_id);
- kfree(shrinker->nr_deferred);
- shrinker->nr_deferred = NULL;
-
- kfree(shrinker);
+ call_rcu(&shrinker->rcu, shrinker_free_rcu_cb);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(shrinker_free);
--
2.30.2
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
