> Markus, stop bothering people about trivial nonsense. I suggest to reconsider such feedback a bit more. I got the impression that an information like “Describe your changes in imperative mood” belongs to a basic requirement. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.4#n94 You shared your special opinions for this topic also at other places recently, didn't you? > I've said this to you before, that if you spot a bug in a patch I got trained to take also another look at various change descriptions. > that's welcome feedback Further details can occasionally be improved by the means of patch reviews. > but if you just have comments about grammar then no one wants that. I know that some contributors and maintainers would like to care for nicer wordings. Regards, Markus -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
