On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 12:29:26PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 10:44:48AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 01:31:25PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 11:15:37AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 04:31:16PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > > > > Set "opened" to "0" before the hotplug script is called. Once the > > > > > device node has been opened, set "opened" to "1". > > > > > > > > > > "opened" is used exclusively by userspace. It serves two purposes: > > > > > > > > > > 1. It tells userspace that the diskseq Xenstore entry is supported. > > > > > > > > > > 2. It tells userspace that it can wait for "opened" to be set to 1. > > > > > Once "opened" is 1, blkback has a reference to the device, so > > > > > userspace doesn't need to keep one. > > > > > > > > > > Together, these changes allow userspace to use block devices with > > > > > delete-on-close behavior, such as loop devices with the autoclear flag > > > > > set or device-mapper devices with the deferred-remove flag set. > > > > > > > > There was some work in the past to allow reloading blkback as a > > > > module, it's clear that using delete-on-close won't work if attempting > > > > to reload blkback. > > > > > > Should blkback stop itself from being unloaded if delete-on-close is in > > > use? > > > > Hm, maybe. I guess that's the best we can do right now. > > I’ll implement this. Let's make this a separate patch. > > > > Isn't there some existing way to check whether a device is opened? > > > > (stat syscall maybe?). > > > > > > Knowing that the device has been opened isn’t enough. The block script > > > needs to be able to wait for blkback (and not something else) to open > > > the device. Otherwise it will be confused if the device is opened by > > > e.g. udev. > > > > Urg, no, the block script cannot wait indefinitely for blkback to open > > the device, as it has an execution timeout. blkback is free to only > > open the device upon guest frontend connection, and that (when using > > libxl) requires the hotplug scripts execution to be finished so the > > guest can be started. > > I’m a bit confused here. My understanding is that blkdev_get_by_dev() > already opens the device, and that happens in the xenstore watch > handler. I have tested this with delete-on-close device-mapper devices, > and it does work. Right, but on a very contended system there's no guarantee of when blkback will pick up the update to "physical-device" and open the device, so far the block script only writes the physical-device node and exits. With the proposed change the block script will also wait for blkback to react to the physcal-device write, hence making VM creation slower. > > > > I would like to avoid adding more xenstore blkback state if such > > > > information can be fetched from other methods. > > > > > > I don’t think it can be, unless the information is passed via a > > > completely different method. Maybe netlink(7) or ioctl(2)? Arguably > > > this information should not be stored in Xenstore at all, as it exposes > > > backend implementation details to the frontend. > > > > Could you maybe use sysfs for this information? > > Probably? This would involve adding a new file in sysfs. > > > We have all sorts of crap in xenstore, but it would be best if we can > > see of placing stuff like this in another interface. > > Fair. Let's see if that's a suitable approach, and we can avoid having to add an extra node to xenstore. Thanks, Roger. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
