On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 06:59:21PM +0000, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-06-06 at 15:13 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> > need_switch_pathgroup() only checks if the currently used pathgroup
> > is
> > not the highest priority pathgroup. If it isn't, all multipathd does
> > is
> > instruct the kernel to switch to the correct pathgroup. However, the
> > kernel treats the pathgroups as if they were ordered by priority.
> > When
> > the kernel runs out of paths to use in the currently selected
> > pathgroup,
> > it will start checking the pathgroups in order until it finds one
> > with
> > usable paths.
> >
> > need_switch_pathgroup() should also check if the pathgroups are out
> > of
> > order, and if so, multipathd should reload the map to reorder them
> > correctly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > multipathd/main.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > --
> > 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/multipathd/main.c b/multipathd/main.c
> > index f603d143..05c74e9e 100644
> > --- a/multipathd/main.c
> > +++ b/multipathd/main.c
> > @@ -395,11 +395,46 @@ void
> > put_multipath_config(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * The path group orderings that this function finds acceptible are
> > different
> > + * from now select_path_group determines the best pathgroup. The
> > idea here is
> > + * to only trigger a kernel reload when it is obvious that the
> > pathgroups would
> > + * be out of order, even if all the paths were usable. Thus
> > pathgroups with
> > + * PRIO_UNDEF are skipped, and the number of enabled paths doesn't
> > matter here.
> > + */
> > +bool path_groups_in_order(struct multipath *mpp)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > + struct pathgroup *pgp;
> > + bool seen_marginal_pg = false;
> > + int last_prio = INT_MAX;
> > +
> > + if (VECTOR_SIZE(mpp->pg) < 2)
> > + return true;
> > +
> > + vector_foreach_slot(mpp->pg, pgp, i) {
> > + /* skip pgs with PRIO_UNDEF, since this is likely
> > temporary */
> > + if (!pgp->paths || pgp->priority == PRIO_UNDEF)
> > + continue;
> > + if (pgp->marginal && !seen_marginal_pg) {
> > + last_prio = INT_MAX;
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > + if (seen_marginal_pg && !pgp->marginal)
> > + return false;
> > + if (pgp->priority > last_prio)
> > + return false;
> > + last_prio = pgp->priority;
> > + }
> > + return true;
> > +}
>
> I still don't get the logic here. What's the point of using
> seen_marginal_pg if it is always false? See my previous reply to v1 of
> this patch.
That's because the logic's all messed up. It should be:
if (pgp->marginal && !seen_marginal_pg) {
seen_marginal_pg = true;
last_prio = pgp->priority;
continue;
}
You reset the priority to make sure that the marginal pgs are in
priority order as well, but you need to reset it to the first marginal
pg's priority. And yes, once you see a marginal pg, you should set
seen_marginal_pg.
Also the (seen_marginal_pg && !pgp->marginal) check should happen first
in the loop. Even if the path group doesn't currently have any usable
paths, non-marginal pgs should always be before marginal pgs.
I'll post a V3 patchset.
-Ben
>
> Regards
> Martin
>
>
>
> > +
> > static int
> > -need_switch_pathgroup (struct multipath * mpp)
> > +need_switch_pathgroup (struct multipath * mpp, bool *need_reload)
> > {
> > int bestpg;
> >
> > + *need_reload = false;
> > if (!mpp)
> > return 0;
> >
> > @@ -411,10 +446,9 @@ need_switch_pathgroup (struct multipath * mpp)
> > return 0;
> >
> > mpp->bestpg = bestpg;
> > - if (mpp->bestpg != mpp->nextpg)
> > - return 1;
> > + *need_reload = !path_groups_in_order(mpp);
> >
> > - return 0;
> > + return (*need_reload || mpp->bestpg != mpp->nextpg);
> > }
> >
> > static void
> > @@ -1963,20 +1997,26 @@ ghost_delay_tick(struct vectors *vecs)
> > }
> >
> > static void
> > -deferred_failback_tick (vector mpvec)
> > +deferred_failback_tick (struct vectors *vecs)
> > {
> > struct multipath * mpp;
> > unsigned int i;
> > + bool need_reload;
> >
> > - vector_foreach_slot (mpvec, mpp, i) {
> > + vector_foreach_slot (vecs->mpvec, mpp, i) {
> > /*
> > * deferred failback getting sooner
> > */
> > if (mpp->pgfailback > 0 && mpp->failback_tick > 0) {
> > mpp->failback_tick--;
> >
> > - if (!mpp->failback_tick &&
> > need_switch_pathgroup(mpp))
> > - switch_pathgroup(mpp);
> > + if (!mpp->failback_tick &&
> > + need_switch_pathgroup(mpp, &need_reload))
> > {
> > + if (need_reload)
> > + reload_and_sync_map(mpp,
> > vecs);
> > + else
> > + switch_pathgroup(mpp);
> > + }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > @@ -2219,6 +2259,7 @@ check_path (struct vectors * vecs, struct path
> > * pp, unsigned int ticks)
> > struct config *conf;
> > int marginal_pathgroups, marginal_changed = 0;
> > int ret;
> > + bool need_reload;
> >
> > if (((pp->initialized == INIT_OK || pp->initialized ==
> > INIT_PARTIAL ||
> > pp->initialized == INIT_REQUESTED_UDEV) && !pp->mpp) ||
> > @@ -2548,13 +2589,17 @@ check_path (struct vectors * vecs, struct
> > path * pp, unsigned int ticks)
> > condlog(2, "%s: path priorities changed. reloading",
> > pp->mpp->alias);
> > reload_and_sync_map(pp->mpp, vecs);
> > - } else if (need_switch_pathgroup(pp->mpp)) {
> > + } else if (need_switch_pathgroup(pp->mpp, &need_reload)) {
> > if (pp->mpp->pgfailback > 0 &&
> > (new_path_up || pp->mpp->failback_tick <= 0))
> > pp->mpp->failback_tick = pp->mpp->pgfailback
> > + 1;
> > else if (pp->mpp->pgfailback == -FAILBACK_IMMEDIATE
> > ||
> > - (chkr_new_path_up &&
> > followover_should_failback(pp)))
> > - switch_pathgroup(pp->mpp);
> > + (chkr_new_path_up &&
> > followover_should_failback(pp))) {
> > + if (need_reload)
> > + reload_and_sync_map(pp->mpp, vecs);
> > + else
> > + switch_pathgroup(pp->mpp);
> > + }
> > }
> > return 1;
> > }
> > @@ -2680,7 +2725,7 @@ unlock:
> > pthread_cleanup_push(cleanup_lock, &vecs->lock);
> > lock(&vecs->lock);
> > pthread_testcancel();
> > - deferred_failback_tick(vecs->mpvec);
> > + deferred_failback_tick(vecs);
> > retry_count_tick(vecs->mpvec);
> > missing_uev_wait_tick(vecs);
> > ghost_delay_tick(vecs);
>
>
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
