po 22. 5. 2023 v 13:17 odesílatel Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@xxxxxxxxxxx> napsal:
>
> +static int __blkdev_copy_offload(struct block_device *bdev_in, loff_t pos_in,
> + struct block_device *bdev_out, loff_t pos_out, size_t len,
> + cio_iodone_t endio, void *private, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> +{
> + struct cio *cio;
> + struct copy_ctx *ctx;
> + struct bio *read_bio, *write_bio;
> + struct page *token;
> + sector_t copy_len;
> + sector_t rem, max_copy_len;
> +
> + cio = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cio), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!cio)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + atomic_set(&cio->refcount, 0);
> + cio->waiter = current;
> + cio->endio = endio;
> + cio->private = private;
> +
> + max_copy_len = min(bdev_max_copy_sectors(bdev_in),
> + bdev_max_copy_sectors(bdev_out)) << SECTOR_SHIFT;
> +
> + cio->pos_in = pos_in;
> + cio->pos_out = pos_out;
> + /* If there is a error, comp_len will be set to least successfully
> + * completed copied length
> + */
> + cio->comp_len = len;
> + for (rem = len; rem > 0; rem -= copy_len) {
> + copy_len = min(rem, max_copy_len);
> +
> + token = alloc_page(gfp_mask);
> + if (unlikely(!token))
> + goto err_token;
[...]
> +err_token:
> + cio->comp_len = min_t(sector_t, cio->comp_len, (len - rem));
> + if (!atomic_read(&cio->refcount))
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + /* Wait for submitted IOs to complete */
> + return blkdev_copy_wait_completion(cio);
> +}
Suppose the first call to "token = alloc_page()" fails (and
cio->refcount == 0), isn't "cio" going to be leaked here?
Maurizio
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
