Re: [PATCH v6 07/12] x86/cpu/keylocker: Load an internal wrapping key at boot-time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/8/23 17:31, Chang S. Bae wrote:
>> With the macro, they'll get no type warning.  The inline actually makes
>> it easier to find bugs because folks will get _some_ type checking no
>> matter how they compile the code.
> 
> Ah, when the prototype with one or more arguments, 'static inline'
> allows the check. Then it is not an 'either-way' thing.
> 
> Looking at the x86 code, there are some seemingly related:
> 
> $ git grep "do { } while (0)" arch/x86 | grep -v "()"
...

Right.  It's not a hard and fast rule.  We certainly take code either
way and there can be real reasons to do it one way versus the other.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux