On Apr 25, 2023 / 16:22, Yu Kuai wrote: > Hi, > > 在 2023/01/12 9:05, Shinichiro Kawasaki 写道: > > Hello Yu, thanks for the patch. I think it is good to have this test case to > > avoid repeating the same regression. Please find my comments in line. > > > > CC+: Mike, dm-devel, > > > > Mike, could you take a look in this new test case? It adds "dm" test group to > > blktests. If you have thoughts on how to add device-mapper related test cases > > to blktests, please share (Or we may be able to discuss later at LSF 2023). > > Can we add "dm" test group to blktests? I'll send a new version if we > can. I suggest to wait for LSF discussion in May, which could be a good chance to hear opinions of dm experts. I think your new test case is valuable, so IMO it should be added to the new "dm" group, or at least to the existing "block" group. Let's decide the target group after LSF. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
