On 19/04/2023 16:19, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 04:09:29PM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
Now that all users of bio_add_page check for the return value, mark
bio_add_page as __must_check.
Should probably add __must_check to bio_add_folio too? If this is
really the way you want to go ... means we also need a
__bio_add_folio().
I admit I haven't thought of folios, mea culpa.
3 of the callers of bio_add_folio() don't check the return value:
$ git grep -E '\sbio_add_folio\b'
fs/iomap/buffered-io.c: bio_add_folio(ctx->bio, folio, plen, poff);
fs/iomap/buffered-io.c: bio_add_folio(&bio, folio, plen, poff);
fs/iomap/buffered-io.c: bio_add_folio(wpc->ioend->io_bio, folio,
len, poff);
But from a quick look they look OK to me.
Does that look reasonable to you:
diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
index fd11614bba4d..f3a3524b53e4 100644
--- a/block/bio.c
+++ b/block/bio.c
@@ -1138,6 +1138,14 @@ int bio_add_page(struct bio *bio, struct page *page,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_add_page);
+void __bio_add_folio(struct bio *bio, struct folio *folio, size_t len,
+ size_t off)
+{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(len > UINT_MAX);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(off > UINT_MAX);
+ __bio_add_page(bio, &folio->page, len, off);
+}
+
/**
* bio_add_folio - Attempt to add part of a folio to a bio.
* @bio: BIO to add to.
Byte,
Johannes
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
