On Thu, 2023-03-09 at 14:11 -0800, Brian Bunker wrote: > > > On Mar 9, 2023, at 1:50 PM, Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Brian, > > > > On Thu, 2023-03-09 at 13:40 -0800, Brian Bunker wrote: > > > > > > Martin, > > > > > > Sorry I bounce between kernel versions a lot since most of the > > > problems which find their way to us are released Linux versions > > > whose kernels are quite a bit older than upstream.I got a chance > > > to try the proposed solutions. The PATH_GHOST above does what > > > I am looking for which is not to have the path checker fail the > > > path. > > > > > > This also works as your earlier comments suggest. This does seem > > > clearer as to what is happening on the path: > > > > > > > I apologize for being slow, but I don't quite understand this > > response. > > Have you tested Ben's patch set? Does it work for you? Is the patch > > below meant to be applied on top of Ben's work? > > > > Martin > Martin, > > This is just a patch I made instead of the original patch to verify > using PATH_PENDING would work in our case, and it does. It has > no relationship to anything Ben was doing. Thanks for the clarification. Please, if you have time, give Ben's set a test. Martin -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
