On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 05:35:20PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > --> 2758 if (test_bit(DM_CRYPT_NO_READ_WORKQUEUE, &cc->flags) || > ^^^^^^^^^ > 2759 test_bit(DM_CRYPT_NO_WRITE_WORKQUEUE, &cc->flags)) > ^^^^^^^^^ > UAF. This wasn't tested, right? If this passes testing then it means > kfree_sensitive() is broken. (Normally UAF bugs can only be detected > with KASan, but kfree_sensitive() should poison the data I thought). > Nope. This is thing where you need KASan to detect the bug. I'm wrong and continually demonstrate how even twenty years in to it I still don't understand pointers. regards, dan carpenter -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
