On 12/5/22 08:20, Alvaro Karsz wrote:
+/* Get lifetime information struct for each request */ +struct virtio_blk_lifetime { + /* + * specifies the percentage of reserved blocks that are consumed. + * optional values following virtio spec: + * 0 - undefined + * 1 - normal, < 80% of reserved blocks are consumed + * 2 - warning, 80% of reserved blocks are consumed + * 3 - urgent, 90% of reserved blocks are consumed + */ + __le16 pre_eol_info; + /* + * this field refers to wear of SLC cells and is provided in increments of 10used, + * and so on, thru to 11 meaning estimated lifetime exceeded. All values above 11 + * are reserved + */ + __le16 device_lifetime_est_typ_a; + /* + * this field refers to wear of MLC cells and is provided with the same semantics as + * device_lifetime_est_typ_a + */ + __le16 device_lifetime_est_typ_b; +};
Why does the above data structure only refer to SLC and MLC but not to TLC or QLC? How will this data structure be extended without having to introduce a new ioctl? Thanks, Bart. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel