Re: [PATCH v2 16/20] scsi: Have sd pr_ops return a blk_status_t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/20] scsi: Have sd pr_ops return a blk_status_t
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 09:18:03 +0200
Cc: axboe@xxxxxxxxx, james.bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bvanassche@xxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx, snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20220809000419.10674-17-michael.christie@oracle.com>
References: <20220809000419.10674-1-michael.christie@oracle.com> <20220809000419.10674-17-michael.christie@oracle.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 07:04:15PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
> This patch has the sd pr_ops convert from the low level SCSI errors to a
> blk_status_t.

Can you document the why here?

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2 16/20] scsi: Have sd pr_ops return a blk_status_t
  - From: Mike Christie

References:
- [PATCH 0/20] Use block pr_ops in LIO
  - From: Mike Christie
- [PATCH v2 16/20] scsi: Have sd pr_ops return a blk_status_t
  - From: Mike Christie

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 14/20] scsi: Retry pr_ops commands if a UA is returned.
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 06/20] nvme: Fix reservation status related structs
Previous by thread: [PATCH v2 16/20] scsi: Have sd pr_ops return a blk_status_t
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 16/20] scsi: Have sd pr_ops return a blk_status_t
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [DM Crypt] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Packaging] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite Discussion] [KDE Users] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux