Hi, Please see this updated patchset that reflects what I've staged for the 5.20 merge window, see: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/log/?h=dm-5.20 My only outstanding question, from previous v1 patchset, is: should the verify_wq be created using WQ_HIGHPRI instead of WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE? (I doubt it has a significant impact on performance but if you have insight on why you made that change, and if it meaningful, I'd happily apply the change). I've tested using cryptsetup's testsuite (which has dm-verity tests) but I haven't tested the "try_verify_in_tasklet" feature. I'd welcome review and focused "try_verify_in_tasklet" testing. Thanks, Mike Mike Snitzer (3): dm verity: allow optional args to alter primary args handling dm bufio: conditionally enable branching for DM_BUFIO_CLIENT_NO_SLEEP dm verity: conditionally enable branching for "try_verify_in_tasklet" Nathan Huckleberry (3): dm bufio: Add flags argument to dm_bufio_client_create dm bufio: Add DM_BUFIO_CLIENT_NO_SLEEP flag dm verity: Add optional "try_verify_in_tasklet" feature drivers/md/dm-bufio.c | 32 ++++- drivers/md/dm-ebs-target.c | 3 +- drivers/md/dm-integrity.c | 2 +- drivers/md/dm-snap-persistent.c | 2 +- drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.c | 4 +- drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c | 121 +++++++++++++++--- drivers/md/dm-verity.h | 7 +- drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-block-manager.c | 3 +- include/linux/dm-bufio.h | 8 +- 9 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) -- 2.32.1 (Apple Git-133) -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
