On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 12:39:12PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote: > 1. Let's say you do an active-active setup with 2 paths in one priority group, > and the Write Exclusive or Exclusive Access reservation went down pathA so it's > the holder. When the app does IO to /dev/dm-0 the path selectors aren't PGR aware > so IO can go down any path. For Write Exclusive, when WRITEs go down pathB they > get failed with reservation conflicts (sbc4r22 table 13). So this type of > reservation and active-active would only be useful for read-only work loads. > > For Exclusive Access READ/WRITEs can only go down pathA ok. If they go down > PathB we will get reservation conflicts. So it's really useless in an active- > active setup. It's not useless. It just needs all paths to be registered. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel