Re: [PATCH 2/3] dm: Start pr_reserve from the same starting path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 12:39:12PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
> 1. Let's say you do an active-active setup with 2 paths in one priority group,
> and the Write Exclusive or Exclusive Access reservation went down pathA so it's
> the holder. When the app does IO to /dev/dm-0 the path selectors aren't PGR aware
> so IO can go down any path. For Write Exclusive, when WRITEs go down pathB they
> get failed with reservation conflicts (sbc4r22 table 13). So this type of
> reservation and active-active would only be useful for read-only work loads.
> 
> For Exclusive Access READ/WRITEs can only go down pathA ok. If they go down
> PathB we will get reservation conflicts. So it's really useless in an active-
> active setup.

It's not useless.  It just needs all paths to be registered.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux