Re: [PATCH 08/11] scsi: target: Add block PR support to iblock.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> +static sense_reason_t iblock_execute_pr_in(struct se_cmd *cmd, u8 sa,
> +					   unsigned char *param_data)
> +{
> +	sense_reason_t ret;
> +
> +	switch (sa) {
> +	case PRI_REPORT_CAPABILITIES:
> +		iblock_pr_report_caps(param_data);
> +		break;
> +	case PRI_READ_KEYS:
> +		ret = iblock_pr_read_keys(cmd, param_data);
> +		break;
> +	case PRI_READ_RESERVATION:
> +		ret = iblock_pr_read_reservation(cmd, param_data);
> +		break;
> +	case PRI_READ_FULL_STATUS:
> +	default:
> +		pr_err("Unknown PERSISTENT_RESERVE_IN SA: 0x%02x\n", sa);
> +		return TCM_UNSUPPORTED_SCSI_OPCODE;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;


ret is uninitialize in the iblock_pr_report_caps case.

> +	switch (cdb[0]) {
> +	case RESERVE:
> +	case RESERVE_10:
> +	case RELEASE:
> +	case RELEASE_10:
> +		/*
> +		 * The block layer pr_ops don't support the old RESERVE/RELEASE
> +		 * commands.
> +		 */
> +		if (dev->dev_attrib.emulate_pr &&
> +		    (dev->transport_flags & TRANSPORT_FLAG_PASSTHROUGH_PGR))
> +			return TCM_UNSUPPORTED_SCSI_OPCODE;
> +	}

Can't this check go straight int sbc_parse_cdb?

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux