On Thu, 2022-06-16 at 22:32 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > On 4/1/22 12:20, Martin Wilck wrote: > > > On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 19:57 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > > > On 3/28/22 19:48, Martin Wilck wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 19:04 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > > > > > Cc: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx> > > > > > Cc: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Cc: Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Cc: DM-DEVEL ML <dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > > > README.nvme | 12 ++++++++++++ > > > > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > > > > create mode 100644 README.nvme > > > > > > > > Why another separate README with just 12 lines? > > > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > README.md is intended multipath-tools developers. > > > And README.alua and README.nvme are for sysadmins. > > > > > > > I see no fundamental reason not to merge all READMEs into one, > > and create "sysadmin" and "developer" sections. > > README.md is in markdown syntax. > README.alua and README.nvme are plain text, and its content is easier > to identify. > Are you running out of inodes? :-) No, it' about user friendliness. These .txt files are developer-level documentation, while ALUA and NVMe are topic which are at least as important to users as for developers. Distributions tend to ship the READMEs under /usr/share/doc, but to be realistic, how many users still look there for documentation these days? Regards, Martin -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
