On Thu, 2022-06-09 at 18:56 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > On 6/9/22 18:49, Martin Wilck wrote: > > > IIUC NetApp's concern is not the generic entry, but the entries > > mentioning E-Series or it's OEM products in NVMe configuration > > explicitly. I also have some trouble understanding the concern, but > > NetApp is in charge of these entries, so I believe we should > > respect > > what they're saying. > > > > With the late patches I submitted, the generic NVMe defaults would > > work > > for the NetApp devices without those being explicitly mentioned. I > > hope > > this is ok for everyone. Only the no_path_retry setting would get > > lost, > > which is acceptable IMO because this is rather an admin setting > > than > > product-specific. > > And now (IMO) it is worse, because NetApp NVMe arrays are under a > generic config. > > What do they hate? just ".product = "NetApp E-Series"" ??? I can't speak for Steve, but yes, this is what I understood. The concern is that someone would read the entry and conclude that this configuration is officially endorsed and supported by NetApp. This is why I added the disclaimer in the man page. Regards, Martin -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
