On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 06:54:11PM +0200, Pankaj Raghav wrote:
> Superblocks for zoned devices are fixed as 2 zones at 0, 512GB and 4TB.
> These are fixed at these locations so that recovery tools can reliably
> retrieve the superblocks even if one of the mirror gets corrupted.
>
> power of 2 zone sizes align at these offsets irrespective of their
> value but non power of 2 zone sizes will not align.
>
> To make sure the first zone at mirror 1 and mirror 2 align, write zero
> operation is performed to move the write pointer of the first zone to
> the expected offset. This operation is performed only after a zone reset
> of the first zone, i.e., when the second zone that contains the sb is FULL.
Is it a good idea to do the "write zeros", instead of a plain "set write
pointer"? I assume setting write pointer is instant, while writing
potentially hundreds of megabytes may take significiant time. As the
functions may be called from random contexts, the increased time may
become a problem.
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/zoned.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
> index 3023c871e..805aeaa76 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
> @@ -760,11 +760,44 @@ int btrfs_check_mountopts_zoned(struct btrfs_fs_info *info)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int fill_sb_wp_offset(struct block_device *bdev, struct blk_zone *zone,
> + int mirror, u64 *wp_ret)
> +{
> + u64 offset = 0;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + ASSERT(!is_power_of_two_u64(zone->len));
> + ASSERT(zone->wp == zone->start);
> + ASSERT(mirror != 0);
This could simply accept 0 as the mirror offset too, the calculation is
trivial.
> +
> + switch (mirror) {
> + case 1:
> + div64_u64_rem(BTRFS_SB_LOG_FIRST_OFFSET >> SECTOR_SHIFT,
> + zone->len, &offset);
> + break;
> + case 2:
> + div64_u64_rem(BTRFS_SB_LOG_SECOND_OFFSET >> SECTOR_SHIFT,
> + zone->len, &offset);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + ret = blkdev_issue_zeroout(bdev, zone->start, offset, GFP_NOFS, 0);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + zone->wp += offset;
> + zone->cond = BLK_ZONE_COND_IMP_OPEN;
> + *wp_ret = zone->wp << SECTOR_SHIFT;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int sb_log_location(struct block_device *bdev, struct blk_zone *zones,
> - int rw, u64 *bytenr_ret)
> + int rw, int mirror, u64 *bytenr_ret)
> {
> u64 wp;
> int ret;
> + bool zones_empty = false;
>
> if (zones[0].type == BLK_ZONE_TYPE_CONVENTIONAL) {
> *bytenr_ret = zones[0].start << SECTOR_SHIFT;
> @@ -775,13 +808,31 @@ static int sb_log_location(struct block_device *bdev, struct blk_zone *zones,
> if (ret != -ENOENT && ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> + if (ret == -ENOENT)
> + zones_empty = true;
> +
> if (rw == WRITE) {
> struct blk_zone *reset = NULL;
> + bool is_sb_offset_write_req = false;
> + u32 reset_zone_nr = -1;
>
> - if (wp == zones[0].start << SECTOR_SHIFT)
> + if (wp == zones[0].start << SECTOR_SHIFT) {
> reset = &zones[0];
> - else if (wp == zones[1].start << SECTOR_SHIFT)
> + reset_zone_nr = 0;
> + } else if (wp == zones[1].start << SECTOR_SHIFT) {
> reset = &zones[1];
> + reset_zone_nr = 1;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Non po2 zone sizes will not align naturally at
> + * mirror 1 (512GB) and mirror 2 (4TB). The wp of the
> + * 1st zone in those superblock mirrors need to be
> + * moved to align at those offsets.
> + */
Please move this comment to the helper fill_sb_wp_offset itself, there
it's more discoverable.
> + is_sb_offset_write_req =
> + (zones_empty || (reset_zone_nr == 0)) && mirror &&
> + !is_power_of_2(zones[0].len);
Accepting 0 as the mirror number would also get rid of this wild
expression substituting and 'if'.
>
> if (reset && reset->cond != BLK_ZONE_COND_EMPTY) {
> ASSERT(sb_zone_is_full(reset));
> @@ -795,6 +846,13 @@ static int sb_log_location(struct block_device *bdev, struct blk_zone *zones,
> reset->cond = BLK_ZONE_COND_EMPTY;
> reset->wp = reset->start;
> }
> +
> + if (is_sb_offset_write_req) {
And get rid of the conditional. The point of supporting both po2 and
nonpo2 is to hide any implementation details to wrappers as much as
possible.
> + ret = fill_sb_wp_offset(bdev, &zones[0], mirror, &wp);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> } else if (ret != -ENOENT) {
> /*
> * For READ, we want the previous one. Move write pointer to
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
