On 2022-05-16 23:58, David Sterba wrote:
>> Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/zoned.c | 13 +++++++++----
>> fs/btrfs/zoned.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
>> index 06f22c021..e8c7cebb2 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
>> @@ -511,6 +511,11 @@ int btrfs_get_dev_zone_info(struct btrfs_device *device, bool populate_cache)
>> max_active_zones - nactive);
>> }
>>
>> + /* Cache the sb zone number */
>> + for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_SUPER_MIRROR_MAX; ++i) {
>> + zone_info->sb_zone_location[i] =
>> + sb_zone_number(zone_info->zone_size_shift, i);
>> + }
>
> I don't think we need to cache the value right now, it's not in any hot
> path and call to bdev_zone_no is relatively cheap (only dereferencing a
> few pointers, all in-memory values).
Ok. I will fix it up in the next revision! Thanks.
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
