On 4/12/2022 2:53 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 01:47:42PM -0600, Jane Chu wrote: >> There is no _set_memory_prot internal helper, while coming across >> the code, might as well fix the comment. >> >> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c >> index abf5ed76e4b7..38af155aaba9 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c >> @@ -1816,7 +1816,7 @@ static inline int cpa_clear_pages_array(struct page **pages, int numpages, >> } >> >> /* >> - * _set_memory_prot is an internal helper for callers that have been passed >> + * __set_memory_prot is an internal helper for callers that have been passed >> * a pgprot_t value from upper layers and a reservation has already been taken. >> * If you want to set the pgprot to a specific page protocol, use the >> * set_memory_xx() functions. >> -- > > This is such a trivial change so that having it as a separate patch is > probably not needed - might as well merge it with patch 3... This change used to be folded in the mce patch, but for that I received a review comment pointing out that the change is unrelated to the said patch and doesn't belong, hence I pulled it out to stand by itself. :) thanks! -jane > > Thx. > -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
