On Tue, 2022-04-12 at 12:31 +0200, Martin Wilck wrote: > On Mon, 2022-04-11 at 20:59 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: > > Some storage arrays can be accessed using multiple protocols at the > > same > > time. I've have customers request the ability to set different > > values > > for the path specific timeouts, like fast_io_fail_tmo, based on the > > protocol used to access the path. In order to make this possible, > > this > > patchset adds a new protocol subsection to the device subsection > > and > > the > > overrides section. This allows users to set a device config's path > > specific timeouts, such as dev_loss_tmo, fast_io_fail_tmo, and > > eh_deadline on a per-protocol basis. > > Sigh... I am not happy about this amount of additional complexity in > the multipath configuration. I'll postpone a detailed review of patch 03 ff. of this series until we agree how the user-facing side should look like. Martin -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
