On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 12:48 PM Jane Chu <jane.chu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Introduce DAX_RECOVERY flag to dax_direct_access(). The flag is
> not set by default in dax_direct_access() such that the helper
> does not translate a pmem range to kernel virtual address if the
> range contains uncorrectable errors. When the flag is set,
> the helper ignores the UEs and return kernel virtual adderss so
> that the caller may get on with data recovery via write.
It strikes me that there is likely never going to be any other flags
to dax_direct_access() and what this option really is an access type.
I also find code changes like this error prone to read:
- rc = dax_direct_access(iter->iomap.dax_dev, pgoff, 1, &kaddr, NULL);
+ rc = dax_direct_access(iter->iomap.dax_dev, pgoff, 1, 0, &kaddr, NULL);
...i.e. without looking at the prototype, which option is the nr_pages
and which is the flags?
So how about change 'int flags' to 'enum dax_access_mode mode' where
dax_access_mode is:
/**
* enum dax_access_mode - operational mode for dax_direct_access()
* @DAX_ACCESS: nominal access, fail / trim access on encountering poison
* @DAX_RECOVERY_WRITE: ignore poison and provide a pointer suitable
for use with dax_recovery_write()
*/
enum dax_access_mode {
DAX_ACCESS,
DAX_RECOVERY_WRITE,
};
Then the conversions look like this:
- rc = dax_direct_access(iter->iomap.dax_dev, pgoff, 1, &kaddr, NULL);
+ rc = dax_direct_access(iter->iomap.dax_dev, pgoff, 1,
DAX_ACCESS, &kaddr, NULL);
...and there's less chance of confusion with the @nr_pages argument.
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
