Re: [PATCH 07/27] btrfs: use bdev_max_active_zones instead of open coding it

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/27] btrfs: use bdev_max_active_zones instead of open coding it
From: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 17:20:49 +0200
Cc: jfs-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, target-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, drbd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nilfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, cluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-um@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nbd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-bcache@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ocfs2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ntfs3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20220406060516.409838-8-hch@lst.de>
Mail-followup-to: dsterba@xxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-um@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, drbd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nbd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-bcache@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, target-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, cluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, jfs-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nilfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ntfs3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ocfs2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
References: <20220406060516.409838-1-hch@lst.de> <20220406060516.409838-8-hch@lst.de>
Reply-to: dsterba@xxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12)

On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 08:04:56AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

As it's a standalone patch I can take it (possibly with other similar
prep btrfs patches) in current development cycle to relieve the
inter-tree dependencies.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 07/27] btrfs: use bdev_max_active_zones instead of open coding it
  - From: Christoph Hellwig

References:
- use block_device based APIs in block layer consumers
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- [PATCH 07/27] btrfs: use bdev_max_active_zones instead of open coding it
  - From: Christoph Hellwig

Prev by Date: Potential enhancements to dm-thin v2
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 23/27] block: add a bdev_max_discard_sectors helper
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 07/27] btrfs: use bdev_max_active_zones instead of open coding it
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 07/27] btrfs: use bdev_max_active_zones instead of open coding it
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [DM Crypt] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Packaging] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite Discussion] [KDE Users] [Fedora Docs]