On Thu, 2022-02-10 at 18:30 -0800, Qing Wang wrote: > From: Wang Qing <wangqing@xxxxxxxx> > > It is better to use time_xxx() directly instead of jiffies judgment > for understanding. > > Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@xxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c b/drivers/hid/intel- > ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c > index 8ccb246..15e1423 > --- a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c > +++ b/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c > @@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ static void _ish_sync_fw_clock(struct > ishtp_device *dev) > static unsigned long prev_sync; > uint64_t usec; > > - if (prev_sync && jiffies - prev_sync < 20 * HZ) > + if (prev_sync && time_is_after_jiffies(prev_sync + 20 * HZ)) > return; > > prev_sync = jiffies; -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
