On 2/9/22 5:13 PM, Jinpu Wang wrote:
--- a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c
@@ -548,8 +548,7 @@ static void rnbd_srv_fill_msg_open_rsp(struct rnbd_msg_open_rsp *rsp,
cpu_to_le16(rnbd_dev_get_max_segs(rnbd_dev));
rsp->max_hw_sectors =
cpu_to_le32(rnbd_dev_get_max_hw_sects(rnbd_dev));
- rsp->max_write_same_sectors =
- cpu_to_le32(bdev_write_same(rnbd_dev->bdev));
+ rsp->max_write_same_sectors = 0;
IIUC, I think we can delete max_write_same_sectors from rsp as well given
the earlier change in setup_request_queue and rnbd_clt_set_dev_attr.
No, I don't think it's a good idea, we need to keep the protocol
compatible, so client for old kernel version
won't be confused.
Fair enough. Then I guess it is better to add obsolete_ prefix like
obsolete_rotational.
Thanks,
Guoqing
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel