Re: Any bio_clone_slow() implementation which doesn't share bi_io_vec?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2021/11/23 16:13, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 04:10:35PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Without bio_chain() sounds pretty good, as we can still utilize
bi_end_io and bi_private.

But this also means, we're now responsible not to release the source bio
since it has the real bi_io_vec.

Just call bio_inc_remaining before submitting the cloned bio, and then
call bio_endio on the root bio every time a clone completes.


Does this also mean, we need to save a bi_iter before bio submission, so
that at endio time, we can iterate only the split part of the bio?

Or we have to go back to bio_chain() method, and rely on the parent bio
to iterate all bvecs...

Thanks,
Qu


--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux