On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 12:24 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 09:43:51AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c > > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c > > > @@ -339,6 +339,32 @@ xfs_buftarg_is_dax( > > > bdev_nr_sectors(bt->bt_bdev)); > > > } > > > > > > +static int > > > +xfs_setup_dax( > > > > /me wonders if this should be named xfs_setup_dax_always, since this > > doesn't handle the dax=inode mode? > > Sure, why not. I went ahead and made that change locally. > > > The only reason I bring that up is that Eric reminded me a while ago > > that we don't actually print any kind of EXPERIMENTAL warning for the > > auto-detection behavior. > > Yes, I actually noticed that as well when preparing this series. The rest looks good to me. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
