Re: don't use ->bd_inode to access the block device size v3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/18/21 7:04 PM, Kari Argillander wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:53:08AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> 
> snip..
> 
>> diff --git a/include/linux/genhd.h b/include/linux/genhd.h
>> index 7b0326661a1e..a967b3fb3c71 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/genhd.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/genhd.h
>> @@ -236,14 +236,14 @@ static inline sector_t get_start_sect(struct block_device *bdev)
>>  	return bdev->bd_start_sect;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static inline loff_t bdev_nr_bytes(struct block_device *bdev)
>> +static inline sector_t bdev_nr_sectors(struct block_device *bdev)
>>  {
>> -	return i_size_read(bdev->bd_inode);
>> +	return bdev->bd_nr_sectors;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static inline sector_t bdev_nr_sectors(struct block_device *bdev)
>> +static inline loff_t bdev_nr_bytes(struct block_device *bdev)
>>  {
>> -	return bdev_nr_bytes(bdev) >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
>> +	return bdev_nr_setors(bdev) << SECTOR_SHIFT;
> 
> setors -> sectors

Yep, did catch that prior.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux