On Wed, Sep 29 2021 at 12:35P -0400, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> > > For clarity, avoid using just the "blk_crypto_" prefix for functions and > structs that are specific to blk-crypto-fallback. Instead, use > "blk_crypto_fallback_". Some places already did this, but others > didn't. > > This is also a prerequisite for using "struct blk_crypto_keyslot" to > mean a generic blk-crypto keyslot (which is what it sounds like). > Rename the fallback one to "struct blk_crypto_fallback_keyslot". > > No change in behavior. > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
